I thought about this some... Since "good" sequence images should not have donut stars (the primary driver for HFR refactor), I am thinking about using the older, less precise, but WAY faster routine for star analysis... Maybe. That routine had a nebulosity rejection parameter that is no available (would be too confusing to add HFR parameters that affect different things). SO... I will put a little time into seeing if there is a generally acceptable set of parameters to feed the old routine (or an application level setting to use the faster one).
↧